Chunk
District Court, S.D. New York
In Admiralty. On exceptions to commissioner’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, District Judge.
These actions were decided on the merits June 17,1903 — 124 Fed. 786 — and referred to a commissioner to examine the claims, &c. He now reports that there were 53 claims filed and testimony presented in 39 of them. Exceptions to his report have been filed in a number of the cases, mainly directed to the amounts reported. I have examined the matters involved carefully and conclude that the commissioner has been very conservative in his estimates of the losses and as he had the witnesses before him, I do not think it would be proper for me to take up anew the questions of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Butler v. Boston & Savannah Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- The City of NorwichSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- The Albert DumoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- O'BRIEN v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The EleanoraU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1879
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boston Marine Ins. v. Metropolitan Redwood Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Saucer v. Willys-Overland, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1931
- The RochesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1936
- Washington Industrial Bldg. Co. v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930