Legal Opinion

Samuel H. Taran v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 3, 1959No. 15950PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant was found guilty by a jury, on each of the two counts in an indictment, of having violated 18 U.S.C. § 1505.

In general, § 1505 serves a purpose in the administrative field similar to that of §§ 1503 and 1504 in the judicial field. The part of it that is here pertinent deals with contaminations of, or endeavors to contaminate, the administration of the law involved “in any proceeding pending before any department or agency of the United States”. More specifically, it creates a criminal offense against “Whoever .corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  2. State ex rel. O'Connor v. WolferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Rathbun v. BaumelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  4. Guy v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. In Re TaranDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lawrence Rice and Walter Chipman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  2. Marvin R. Cole v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. SIRHANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. Allen Ray JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  5. Kellogg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API