Miller v. State

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

After a jury trial, James Miller was convicted of aggravated assault. He appeals, arguing that there is insufficient evidence to support the verdict, and that the trial court made erroneous eviden-tiary rulings and improperly became an advocate for the state. The arguments are without merit, and we thus affirm Miller’s conviction.

1. When reviewing a challenge, to the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the appellant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence. We do not weigh the evidence or determine…