Legal Opinion
Hooper v. Mayor and City Council of Gaithersburg
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 3, 1974No. [No. 103, September Term, 1973.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.
That age does not wither nor custom stale the infinite variety of Montgomery County zoning cases is further borne out by the dispute now before us. Indeed, as we shall see, it seems more a feud than a dispute. The facts and circumstances will more easily be understood by reference to the accompanying plat.
The appellants (Dr. Hooper) own 1 lots A, B, C, D, E-l and E-2. In 1965 Dr. Hooper succeeded in having lots A, B, C and D reclassified from R-90 (Medium Density Residential and Cluster Option) to R-0 (Planned Residential), a classification in which medical offices are permitted. There are…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The Chatham Corp. v. BeltramCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Montgomery County v. National Capital Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Bigenho v. Montgomery County CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Adams v. Board of Trustees of Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Baker v. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Consumer Protection Division Office of the Attorney General v. Consumer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- O'DONNELL v. BasslerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Mortimer v. Howard Research and Development Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Gough v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Howard County v. Davidsonville Area Civic & Potomac River Associations, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.