Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barsumian v. Barsumian

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 6, 1970No. 69-84Published

1DissentOwen, Judge

As I view this case, it is not a matter of one party seeking to renege on an agreement nor seeking to have the terms of the agreement modified, but rather to have the court declare judicially what the parties intended by the agreement.

It is a cardinal rule in the construction of contracts that the intention of the parties thereto is to govern. 7 Fla.Jur., Contracts, § 75. The contract as a whole should be considered, Triple E Development Co. v. Floridagold Citrus Corp., Fla.1951, 51 So.2d 435, and the intention of the parties determined from the language used, considering the surrounding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Triple E Development Co. v. Floridagold Citrus Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. Bezanilla v. BezanillaSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Trail Burger King, Inc. v. Burger King of Miami, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Pembroke Park Lanes, Inc. v. High Ridge Water Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API