In re the Liquidation of United American Bank in Knoxville
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
This case involves numerous parties who have intervened in the pending liquidation proceedings for the United American Bank (UAB) in Knoxville.1 The only issue decided in this opinion is whether a purchase and assumption agreement entered into by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), acting both as the statutorily appointed receiver (FDIC-R) and in its corporate capacity (FDIC-C), and First Tennessee Bank (FTB) created a voidable or illegal preference under Tennessee law. The operative facts are essentially undisputed; the issue is fundamentally a question…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,654 William L. Gunter and Camille S. Gunter v. Theodore M. HutchesonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. W. Jerome AshleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Neff v. Cherokee Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
- Woodbridge Plaza, a General Partnership v. Bank of IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Hibernia National Bank v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gordon McGee v. Carl Pippin, Helen Pippin - ConcurringCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- State of Tennessee, ex rel. William L. Gibbons v. Clayton R. SmartCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013