Dahl v. Armor Building Supply
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 (1). Plaintiffs sustained their initial burden on the motion by demonstrating that Francis Dahl, Jr. (plaintiff) was engaged in a protected activity, the erection of a building or structure (see, Labor Law § 240 [1]), and that his accident involved the elevation-related hazards that the statute was intended to protect against (see, Gordon v Eastern Ry. Supply, 82 NY2d 555, 560-561; see generally, Mel*971ber v 6333 Main St., 91 NY2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Gordon v. Eastern Railway Supply, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Felker v. Corning Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Melber v. 6333 Main Street, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Villeneuve v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fazekas v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Petit v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Kazmierczak v. Town of ClarenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Boncore v. Temple Beth ZionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Lang v. Chas. Mancuso & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.