Legal Opinion

Rayfield v. Farris

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 7, 2002No. A02A0013PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Amy Rayfield appeals from a jury verdict entered against her in this automobile collision case. Rayfield asserts that the trial court erroneously failed to instruct the jury on the doctrine of sudden emergency. We disagree and affirm.

The evidence showed that a Chevrolet Blazer driven by Rayfield struck the rear end of a pickup truck driven by Thomas Hughes, injuring Hughes’s passenger, Beulah Farris. Rayfield testified that she had been following the pickup truck for 15 to 20 minutes. Shortly before the collision, on a straight, flat section of roadway, Rayfield looked down to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wadkins v. SmallwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Jimenez v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. MehretabCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Thomas v. StairsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Lucas v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butgereit v. Enviro-Tech Environmental Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. SMITH Et Al. v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  3. Deloach v. DeloachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Sawyer v. Marjon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Curtis v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API