Legal Opinion

Property Clerk v. Aponte

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward H. Lehner, J.

The principal issue in this case is what nexus must exist between property seized "as a means of committing crime or employed in aid or furtherance of crime” and the crime it allegedly aided in order to subject the property to forfeiture pursuant to section 14-140 (b) of the Administrative Code of the City of New York.

FACTS

This is a special proceeding to declare a forfeiture of respondent’s 1987 Volkswagen which was seized during the course of his arrest on a drug possession charge. The affidavit of the arresting officer states that he observed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1972 Datsun, Vehicle Identification No. LB1100355950District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Property Clerk of New York City Police Department v. HurlstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v. CovellNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Henry v. CastagnaroNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v. CorbettNew York Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Property Clerk of New York City Police Department v. AponteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Vergari v. LockhartNew York Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API