Legal Opinion

Demmer v. Grunke

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1950No. 34,962PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

Our attention is directed to a misstatement of fact in the foregoing opinion. The defendant Louella Grunke, instead of proceeding in a northeasterly direction on Seventh avenue and then across the intersection to turn north on Margaret street, did approach and enter the intersection while she was traveling north on Margaret street. This factual correction does not necessitate or justify any other revision of the opinion, sinceCatherine's view through the rear window and windshield of theStene car, down Margaret street or Seventh avenue, wasvirtually the same. She testified that she saw no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Wojtowicz v. BeldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Lyford v. Jacob Schmidt Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. O'Rourke v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Demmer v. GrunkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API