Legal Opinion

(HC) Petersen v. Kern County District Attorney

District Court, E.D. California

Decided June 5, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00975Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KYLE PETERSEN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00975-NONE-JDP 12 Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS 14 KERN COUNTY DISTRICT OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS ATTORNEY, 15 ECF No. 18 Respondent. 16 ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO WAIVE SERVICE 17 REQUIREMENT AS MOOT 18 ECF No. 29 19 20 Petitioner Kyle Petersen, a state prisoner without counsel, petitioned for a writ of habeas 21 corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. On March 20, 2020, respondent moved to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API