Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Gundolf

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 2, 1964No. 5-3358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Associate Justice.

Appellant DeWitt Bennett III sued three of his young acquaintances to recover damages for personal injuries received when he was run over by his own car. The question of joint adventure also enters into the case.

Tn order to understand the issues raised (particularly that of joint adventure) it is necessary to set out in some detail the facts and circumstances out of which appellant’s injuries arose. The three defendants, Billingsley, Gundo’lf, and Boswell left Benton at about 10 p.m. and drove a short distance to a “bauxite pit” to go swimming and plan a party for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodard v. HollidaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
  2. Stockton v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  3. Wymer v. DedmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Franco v. BunyardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Cox v. MadduxDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API