Legal Opinion

Roemer v. Hoffmann

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 20, 1976No. Civ. A. 76-1632PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIRICA, District Judge.

The plaintiff Martin L. Roemer is a manufacturer’s representative. He specializes in offering the products of a variety of businesses to the armed services exchanges. On August 23, 1976, the plaintiff, in an order from Brig. Gen. Bruce T. Coggins, Assistant Judge Advocate General for Civil Law of the Department of the Army, was debarred from doing any business with any instrumentality of the Department of Defense, including the armed forces exchanges, for a period of three years. Roemer has brought this action to set aside that order. He alleges that:(1) Coggins…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carmen Gonzalez v. Orville L. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shane Meat Co., Inc. And H. Ronald Shane v. United States Department of Defense and Defense Logistics AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Burke v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  3. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. U. S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
  4. Delta Rocky Mountain Petroleum, Inc. v. United States Department of DefenseDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1989
  5. Uzelmeier v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API