Rideout v. Riendeau
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Concurrence
WATHEN, C.J., with whom RUDMAN, J., joins,
concurring.
[¶ 35] I concur in the result reached by the Court but write separately to distance myself from the curiously ambiguous and restricted conclusion “that the state does have a compelling interest in providing a forum within which grandparents who have acted as parents to their grandchild may seek continued contact with that child.” The District Court held that the Grandparents Visitation Act violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution on its face because it requires no showing of harm to the child before a court can…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.