Legal Opinion

Hogue v. Steel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1904PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Clay county; the Hon. S. L. Dwight, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

This was a bill in chancery for a decree partitioning and allotting the east half of the south-east quarter of section 27, town 5, north, range 6, east of the third principal meridian, in Clay county, among the heirs-at-law of one William Steel, deceased. In the proceeding a cross-bill was filed asking that the title to the south-east quarter of the south-east quarter of the said tract be declared to be in one Harriet Hogue, and that the title to the north-east quarter of the south-east quarter of said tract be established in one Emma Cook.

Said William Steel, deceased, received a deed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crouch v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Keith v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Anderson v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Francis v. RoadesIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Forrester v. WattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. O'Dea v. ThromAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
  4. Karsten v. WinkelmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API