Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dimon v. Dimon

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1953No. Docket Nos. S.F. 18118, 18359Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

TRAYNOR, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

These appeals from the judgment of November 25, 1949, and the order of September 15, 1950, bring into question six decisions' of the trial court in favor of plaintiff: (1) judgment for $1,950 as reimbursement for amounts spent for her own support after the Connecticut decree and before her remarriage; (2) judgment for $1,850 as reimbursement for amounts spent for the support of the two minor children after the divorce decree and before commencement of this action; (3) judgment for $37.50 per month for the support of each child from the commencement of…

2Cases cited94 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API