Legal Opinion

Sinclair v. Sinclair

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 10, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

Linwood L. and Edith M. Sinclair appeal from a summary judgment entered in the District Court (Newport, Hjelm, J.) in favor of Rita M. Sinclair. The court determined that foreclosure proceedings against her were ineffective because the Sinclairs failed to comply with the notice requirement of 14 M.R.S.A. § 6111 (Supp.1993). The Sinclairs contend that the court erred in concluding (1) that the Legislature intended section 6111 to apply to mortgages executed before its effective date and (2) that such an application of the statute did not result in an unconstitutional…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  4. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Michaud v. Northern Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. MacImage of Maine, LLC v. Androscoggin CountySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. Reagan v. Racal Mortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  3. Rolec, Inc. v. Finlay Hydrascreen USA, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 1996
  4. Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y, FSB v. NeedhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
  5. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Matthew J. NeedhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API