Legal Opinion

MATTER OF DIAZ v. Lukash

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Kaye.

On this appeal, we must decide whether petitioner, an inmate on California’s death row, has a "substantial interest” in certain records of the Nassau County Medical Examiner, so that he may inspect them. We conclude that the Appellate Division applied an erroneous legal standard and that in the circumstances presented, petitioner does have a substantial interest, as a matter of law, in at least some of the requested records. Accordingly, we reverse the dismissal of the petition and remit for further proceedings.

I

In March 1981, Robert Rubane Diaz, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. DiazCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Central General Hospital, Inc. v. LukashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Central General Hospital, Inc. v. LukashNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. BorakoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Pennington v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Gerardi v. Nassau/Suffolk Airport Connection, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Applegate v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Pennington v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API