Legal Opinion

Brown v. Sundback

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided January 31, 1911No. 2241Published

1Opinion of the Court

MURANE, District Judge.

The transcript on appeal in this case does not contain any proof of service of the notice of appeal, nor does the notice of appeal have indorsed thereon proof of service as required by the Alaska Code.

The case of Williams v. Schmidt, reported in 14 Or. 470, 13 Pac. 305, holds that the notice of appeal is the same character of process as a summons, both being issued to bring the party within the jurisdiction of the court, and that the statute must be strictly complied with.

Counsel for appellant, after motion was made to dismiss the appeal in this court, wished to supply…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barbre v. GoodaleOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Briney v. StarrOregon Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Henness v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Dolph v. NickumOregon Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Williams v. SchmidtOregon Supreme Court · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API