Legal Opinion
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Jackson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 8, 2009PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Having failed to interpose an answer which asserted the defense of lack of standing or to file a timely pre-answer motion raising that defense, the defendant St. Clair Jackson waived such defense pursuant to CPLR 3211 (e) (see HSBC Bank, USA v Dammond, 59 AD3d 679 [2009]; Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v Mastropaolo, 42 AD3d 239 [2007]). Moreover, contrary to Jackson’s contention, under the circumstances of this case, there was no need to conduct a hearing prior to the issuance of the referee’s report (see LBV Props. v Greenport Dev. Co., 188 AD2d 588 [1992]).
Jackson’s remaining contentions are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Ass'n v. MastropaoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- HSBC Bank v. DammondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- LBV Properties v. Greenport Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wachovia Mortgage Corp. v. LopaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. ZlotoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Country Pointe at Dix Hills Home Owners Ass'n v. Beechwood OrganizationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- HABC Bank USA, NA v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.