Legal Opinion
People v. Robinson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 13, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The failure of the prosecutor to turn over the statements of two witnesses until the end of defendant’s case does not warrant reversal. Defense counsel not only failed to object, but affirmatively stated that examining those witnesses on surrebuttal would be “fine”. Additionally, defendant had full knowledge of the testimony the wit*984nesses would offer and, therefore, the statements did not constitute Brady (Brady v Maryland, 373 US 83) material (see, People v Banks, 130 AD2d 498, 499, lv denied 70 NY2d 709). Furthermore, defendant made effective use…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. BanksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. VigliottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992