The Complaint of Hercules Carriers, Inc. v. Florida
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1ConcurrenceClark, Circuit Judge
I. Recovery for Pecuniary Loss for Unintentional Interference with Contract
The judgment of the district court must be affirmed in light of Kingston, but respectfully, I think that the panel in Kingston erred in its holding and in its reliance on Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. Flint, 275 U.S. 303, 48 S.Ct. 134, 72 L.Ed. 290 (1927). The issue in this case is whether a shipowner, whose vessel negligently obstructs passage of the channel from the port of Tampa to the Gulf of Mexico, is liable in damages for actual costs incurred by vessels which are required to remain in the port pending removal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co. v. FlintSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Union Oil Company v. James J. Oppen and John J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Kinsman Transit Company v. City of BuffaloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Byrd v. EnglishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Louisville And Nashville Railroad Co. v. The Tug M/V Bayou LacombeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.