Legal Opinion

Tenneco Oil Co. v. Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1984No. 83-1061PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The Sac and Fox Tribe of Indians (the Tribe) issued oil and gas leases for trust lands. The plaintiff Tenneco Oil Company *574subsequently acquired an interest in one of these leases. The lease provides that its terms will be subject to and governed by federal law. Almost fifty years after the issuance of the original lease, the Tribe enacted several ordinances purporting to impose certain licensing, organizational and taxation requirements on Tenneco as a lessor. The Tribe submitted these ordinances for review by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and was informed that formal federal approval of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Comstock Oil & Gas Inc. v. Alabama & Coushatta Indian TribesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. Miner Electric, Inc. v. Muscogee (Creek) NationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Tenneco Oil Company v. The Sac And Fox Tribe Of Indians Of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jan Graham and Chickasaw Nation, by and Through Overton James, Governor of the Chickasaw NationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Superior Oil Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API