Legal Opinion
Legault v. ARusso
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 29, 1996No. CV-93-365-BPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Legault v. ARusso CV-93-365-B 03/29/96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND Michelle Legault R .I . Civil No. 93-CB-243-P v. N.H. Civil No. 93-365-B Ralph aRusso, et al. O R D E R I signed a consent order on April 5, 1995, awarding Michelle Legault judgment against the Town of Johnston on her claims alleging violations of 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e et seg. (Title VII), 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, R.I. Gen. Laws § 22-5-1 et seg., and R.I. Gen. Laws § 42-112-1 et seg. Accordingly, the Town does not dispute Legault's claim that she is entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees as a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin, Cambridge License Commission, Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Rose Bordanaro v. John McLeod Appeal of City of Everett, Edward Connolly, and Donald BontempoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.