Legal Opinion

Carter v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co.

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 17, 1980No. CIV-80-913-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.

This is an action in libel brought by Plaintiff against Defendants The Houston Chronicle Publishing Company (Chronicle)' and Moselle Boland (Boland). Plaintiff is prosecuting this case pro se. It is asserted that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction by reason of diversity of citizenship and amount in controversy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Defendants have filed herein a Motion to Dismiss, Stay, or Transfer this action which is supported by a Brief and two affidavits. Plaintiff has filed a Brief in opposition thereto.

In support of their Motion, Defendants…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brock v. American Messenger Service, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1986
  2. Cook v. International Harvester Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API