Legal Opinion

Delafield v. Shipman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, first department, affirming a judgment of fhe Special Term. This action was brought for the construction of the will of Richard Delafield, deceased. Testator died November 5. 1873, leaving a will dated January 17 of the same year.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, first department, affirming a judgment of fhe Special Term. This action was brought for the construction of the will of Richard Delafield, deceased. Testator died November 5. 1873, leaving a will dated January 17 of the same year. He left a widow then aged sixty-two years, and six children, five daughters and one son, all unmarried adults, ranging from twenty-four to thirty-seven years of age, and all members of his family. After several devises and bequests, the will contained the following clause : “ All the rest, residue and…

1Opinion of the CourtEarl, J.

We agree with the court below and with the .contention of the respondents, that the corpus of the residuary; estate did not, during the life of the widow, vest in the }€|stator’.s children, and for this conclusion the cases of Warner v. Durant (76 N. Y. 133); Smith v. Edwards (88 N. *295Y. 92), and Shipman v. Rollins (98 N. Y. 311), are ample authority.

The whole income is not given to the children during the- life of the widow, and during her life the estate is vested in the trustees. There is no direct gift to the children, but simply a direction for a division among them after the death of the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Manice v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Moore v. LyonsNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  3. Smith v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Warner v. . DurantNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Livingston v. . GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Talmadge v. SeamanNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of MeikleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API