Legal Opinion

Adams v. Frank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 23, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

The testimony offered by the plaintiff warranted a jury in finding that the defendant employed the plaintiff as a real estate broker to procure a purchaser for certain real estate owned by the defendant; that the plaintiff induced one Leventhal to agree with the defendant to purchase the real estate in question on his (the defendant’s) terms; and that Leventhal “was financially able and ready and willing to put through the sale on the terms agreed on.”

The defendant offered testimony to prove that the authority of the plaintiff was withdrawn and afterwards was extended for two weeks; that at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Smith v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. Pickert v. HairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Norton v. NevillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Goldstein v. TuckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API