Legal Opinion

Potter v. Tyndall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 3, 1974Published

1Opinion of the Court

207 S.E.2d 762 (1974)

285 N.C. 661

Troy D. POTTER, t/a Pamco Farm Service Company, Plaintiff,

v.

Robert TYNDALL, Defendant,

v.

R. C. NOBLE et al., Additional Defendants.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 3, 1974.

Ward, Tucker, Ward & Smith, P. A, Michael P. Flanagan, for the plaintiff, Potter.

David S. Henderson, for the defendants Noble & Powell.

Barden, Stith, McCotter & Stith, Barnes & Braswell, P. A, for the defendant, Plant Food Company.

Lee & Hancock, Moses D. Lassiter, for the defendant, Tyndall.

Petition of plaintiff (Potter) and additional defendants (Noble, Powell, Plant Food) for writ…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Potter v. TyndallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API