Legal Opinion

Ley v. Procter & Gamble Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2010No. 1-09-41PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Ley v. Procter & Gamble Co.,

2010-Ohio-834.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY ANNETTE S. LEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 1-09-41 v. THE PROCTER & GAMBLE CO., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, -and- ADMINISTRATOR, BUREAU OF OPINION WORKERS COMPENSATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. Appeal from Allen County Common Pleas Court Trial Court No. CV 2008 0759 Judgment Affirmed Date of Decision: March 8, 2010 APPEARANCES: Laura G. Harrelson f or Appellant Thomas L. Reitz for Appellee, Annette S. Ley Case No. 1-09-41 PRESTON, J. {¶1} Defendant-appellant, Procter & Gamble Co.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wasinski v. PECO II, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Carrigan v. Shaferly Excavating, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Verhoff v. VerhoffOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API