Legal Opinion
Royal Schnauzers v. Dukes Royal Schnauzers
District Court, D. Utah
Decided May 26, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00170Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH Royal Schnauzers, LLC MEMORANDUM DECISION AND Plaintiff, ORDER vs. Case No. 1:20-CV-00170-DAK Dukes Royal Schnauzers, ZAK McBRIDE, Judge Dale A. Kimball and MARLAYNA McBRIDE, Defendant. This matter is before the court on Defendants’ Zak McBride and Marlayna McBride (“Defendants”) Motion to Reopen Case, Request for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Rule 12(d), and Attorney’s Fees. (ECF No. 21.) Defendants filed their Motion on April 23, 2021. Plaintiff, Royal Schnauzers, LLC (“Royal”), and its counsel did not file a reply. The court has…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Xlear, Inc. v. Focus Nutrition, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Robert J. Debry and Joan Debry v. Wallace R. Noble, Robert Van Wagoner, Delbert Swenson, Rick Warner, and Salt Lake County, and Dale Thurgood and Del K. Bartel, Robert J. Debry and Joan Debry v. Wallace R. Noble, Robert Van Wagoner, Delbert Swenson, Rick Warner, and Salt Lake County, and Dale Thurgood and Del K. BartelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993