Legal Opinion

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGINLEY, Judge.

Westinghouse Electric Corporation (West-' inghouse) appeals from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirming the referee’s decision which awarded worker’s compensation benefits to Harry J. Kloshen (Kloshen). We affirm.

Kloshen was employed by Westinghouse from November 3, 1977, until Westinghouse sold the plant to Liberty Polyglas on November 7,1987. Kloshen continued working with Liberty Polyglas after the sale, retaining the same duties as those he had with Westinghouse. Kloshen first worked with Westinghouse as a protrusion operator and later became a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pawlosky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Boehm v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Volterano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Kraemer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Dunmore School District v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Underground Storage v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Philip Morris/Kraft Foods, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API