Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Chester Rod & Gun Club, Inc. v. Town of Chester

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 2, 2005No. 2004-857Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partNadeau, J.

While I agree with both the trial judge and the majority that the zoning board of adjustment (ZBA) erred in denying the plaintiff’s application for a variance based upon the ZBA’s interpretation of the public interest factor set forth in RSA 674:33, 1(b), I disagree that this error requires that the case be remanded to the ZBA for further proceedings. Given the record before us, I would affirm the decision of the trial court granting the variance.

As the majority notes, the trial court’s decision must be upheld unless the evidence does not support it or it is legally erroneous. Harrington v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  2. New Hampshire Department of Corrections v. ButlandSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  3. Harrington v. Town of WarnerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Appeal of CourvilleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API