Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Neufeld

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1996No. 74,412Published

1DissentLockett, J.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s finding that Representative Neufeld’s alleged criminal threats of blackmail to Representatives Alldritt and McKechnie are protected by Article 2, § 22 of the Kansas Constitution (Speech or Debate Clause) and cannot be introduced as evidence in the criminal blackmail prosecution against Neufeld.

In reaching its conclusion, the majority acknowledges Neufeld’s statement that legislators are frequently pressured to put aside their personal will and vote in a certain way on a bill. The majority notes Neufeld’s declaration that these pressures to vote a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Supreme Court of Virginia v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Gravel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Eastland v. United States Servicemen's FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API