Legal Opinion

Compress of Union v. Stone

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1940No. 34011PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Appellant is engaged in compressing cotton. The Commodity Credit Corporation is a Federal Agency; its entire stock is owned by the Federal Government. It had a large amount of cotton compressed by appellant for which service it paid appellant the sum of $41,025. Claiming authority so to do under Chapter 119 of the Laws of 1934, and amendments thereto, Chapter 222 of the Laws of 1934, and Chapter 158 of the Laws of 1936', the State Tax Commission levied and collected from appellant two per cent on said amount, aggregating $820.-51. Appellant paid the tax under protest and brought suit against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Helvering v. GerhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. New York Ex Rel. Cohn v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Hale v. State Bd. of Assessment and ReviewSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stone v. Green Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tri-State Transit Co. v. StoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Brodhead v. BorthwickHawaii Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Dunn Const. Co. v. CraigMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Edwards House Co. v. StoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API