Legal Opinion
Northern States Contracting Co. v. Oakes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 2, 1934No. 29,487PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LORING-, Justice.
The plaintiff seeks to recover $8,356.71 alleged to be the increased amount which it has been required to pay as premiums for workmen’s compensation insurance during the years 1928 to 1932 on account of the death of Joseph Enrighter, an employe who was killed while in its service by the negligence of the defendant. The plaintiff has appealed from an order sustaining- a demurrer to the amended complaint.
The plaintiff corporation was engaged exclusively in construction work for governmental bodies, including the state, counties, and cities. The plaintiff and Enrighter were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. BrameSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Great Lakes Engineering Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- State v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Rockingham Mutual Fire Ins. v. BosherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Union Oil Company v. James J. Oppen and John J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, LLCSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- Erie Castings Company v. Grinding Supply, Inc. And Acme Abrasive CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.