Legal Opinion

CHAPINOFF v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 2009No. 3D06-2936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

Notwithstanding that the trial which resulted in the criminal convictions now on appeal may have been free of error, we must discharge the defendant because his rights against double jeopardy were violated in an earlier proceeding.

The trial below was the third in which the defendant faced the same charges. In each of the first two — after the jury had been selected, impaneled and sworn, and jeopardy had therefore attached — the trial judge felt it appropriate to grant a mistrial. In each case, this was essentially because of the highly unprofessional, mutually combative…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bertolotti v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. United States v. Albert GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Merchant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API