Legal Opinion

Faison v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 26, 1950Published

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

Findings of Fact

1. The libelants, Henry Faison and Floy Faison, as parents of a deceased seaman, and Mertie Faison, as a sister of the deceased seaman, filed a libel (A142-114) on April 12, 1946, against the United States of America to recover, as beneficiaries under a Second Seaman’s War Risk Life Insurance Policy, for the loss of life of the seaman, Daniel E. Faison. Jurisdiction thereof was founded on Section 1128d of Title 46 U.S.C.A.

2. On April 11, 1950, at the trial of this action the claim of the plaintiff, Mertie Faison, was discontinued.

3. Another libel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of New Jersey. Standard Oil Co. Of New Jersey v. United States. The Yms-12. The John WorthingtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  2. Reinold v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Ferro v. United States Lines Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  4. Stofey v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Carson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API