Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Neidhoefer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Each of three trucks and a street car entered into the chain of events resulting in respondent’s damage. The truck of appellant Neidhoefer & Company is referred to in the evidence as the yellow truck, that of appellant *391Pollet as the gravel truck, and the other truck involved as the malt truck. It is conceded that the driver of the malt truck and the operator of the street car were free from negligence.

A jury question existed as to the negligence of the driver of the yellow truck. The usual questions with relation to the negligence of this driver were properly submitted and there is evidence…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Miller v. LaingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Felix v. SoderbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Smith v. Taylor-Button Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Maher v. LochenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Butts v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Tilden v. AshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Hanson v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Wilson v. KochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Peck v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API