Johnson v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
• CANADY, C.J.,
concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I agree with the majority’s conclusion that section 27.5303(l)(a) governs all public defender motions to withdraw based on conflict — both at the trial and appellate levels — and that the court where the motion is filed is required to review such motions for sufficiency. I disagree, however, with the majority’s conclusion that the Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel (RCC) did not have standing to object to a public defender’s motion to withdraw.
A would-be litigant has standing if “he or she reasonably expects to be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.