Legal Opinion

United States v. Peter Monsanto

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 1, 1988No. 436, Docket 87-1397Published

1Opinion of the Court

852 F.2d 1400

57 USLW 2030

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,

v.

Peter MONSANTO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 436, Docket 87-1397.

United States Court of Appeals,

Second Circuit.

Argued March 30, 1988.

Decided July 1, 1988.

Edward M. Chikofsky, New York City, for defendant-appellant.

John F. Savarese, New York City, Asst. U.S. Atty. S.D. New York (Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty. S.D. New York, Aaron R. Marcu, Mark C. Hansen, Deborah E. Landis, Asst. U.S. Attys., of counsel), for appellee.

Arthur Liman, New York City (Gustave H. Newman, Ronald E. DePetris, New York Counsel of Defense Lawyers, New York State…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence · Feinberg; Concurrence · Winter; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Miner; Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Pierce; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Pratt.

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API