United States v. Peter Monsanto
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
852 F.2d 1400
57 USLW 2030
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Peter MONSANTO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 436, Docket 87-1397.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued March 30, 1988.
Decided July 1, 1988.
Edward M. Chikofsky, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
John F. Savarese, New York City, Asst. U.S. Atty. S.D. New York (Rudolph W. Giuliani, U.S. Atty. S.D. New York, Aaron R. Marcu, Mark C. Hansen, Deborah E. Landis, Asst. U.S. Attys., of counsel), for appellee.
Arthur Liman, New York City (Gustave H. Newman, Ronald E. DePetris, New York Counsel of Defense Lawyers, New York State…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence · Feinberg; Concurrence · Winter; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Miner; Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Pierce; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Pratt.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.