Rose v. City of Tulsa

¶ 11 would let the jury decide whether the City’s driver was negligent. This is not such a case “where the admitted facts are so conclusive” that reasonable men could not disagree. Gwinn v. Payne, 1970 OK 145, ¶ 20, 477 P.2d 680, 683. While the majority emphasizes that the City’s driver was familiar with the road and the intersection, it was the slipperiness of the road that was important. The evidence showed that other cars and people slipped on the unexpectedly slippery surface. After he slid, the driver witnessed a Ford Bronco with big mudder tires apply its brakes and slide all the way…