Legal Opinion

Brooks v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1991No. 84-77PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1095SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

On October 26, 1983, Reginald Brooks was convicted by a jury of one count each of burglary in the second degree, D.C.Code § 22-1801(b) (1981), malicious destruction of property, id. § 22-403, breaking and entering a vending machine, id § 22-3427, and petit larceny, id. § 22-2202. On appeal he contends, among other things,1 that the trial judge committed reversible error by instructing the jury, after it had commenced its deliberations, with respect to the law of aiding and abetting. Brooks claims that the case was tried on the theory that he was the principal and that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Clemons v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Roy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. In Re Ty. B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Tyree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API