Taranto v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1DissentVictory, J.
1,1 dissent from the majority’s holding that the filing of a class action lawsuit suspended the contractual limitations period imposed by Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation’s (“Citizens”) insurance policy. In my view, La. C.C.P. art. 596 does not apply to a contractual limitations period because it expressly operates to only suspend “liberative prescription.” The majority errs in holding otherwise for several reasons.
First, La. C.C. art. 3471 provides that “[a] juridical act purporting to exclude prescription, to specify a longer period than that established by law, or to make…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
- State v. All Prop. and Cas. Ins. CarriersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Katz v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Blanks v. Hibernia InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.