Legal Opinion · Dissent

Taranto v. Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corp.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 2011No. 2010-C-0105Published

1DissentVictory, J.

1,1 dissent from the majority’s holding that the filing of a class action lawsuit suspended the contractual limitations period imposed by Louisiana Citizens Property Insurance Corporation’s (“Citizens”) insurance policy. In my view, La. C.C.P. art. 596 does not apply to a contractual limitations period because it expressly operates to only suspend “liberative prescription.” The majority errs in holding otherwise for several reasons.

First, La. C.C. art. 3471 provides that “[a] juridical act purporting to exclude prescription, to specify a longer period than that established by law, or to make…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  3. State v. All Prop. and Cas. Ins. CarriersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  4. Katz v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Blanks v. Hibernia InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API