Legal Opinion

Stumpp & Walter Co. v. Napanoch Country Club, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchirick, J.

This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

The complaint is based upon section 44 of the Personal Property Law. Paragraph 5 alleges that prior to April 5, 1947, the defendant, Napanoch Country Club, Inc. was “ engaged in the business of operating a hotel, country store, and conducting a bar where liquor and other refreshments were served, and sold ”. Paragraph 6 alleges that on that day said defendant sold and delivered said business, good will and goods, wares and merchandise, fixtures, equipment and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carl Ahlers, Inc. v. DingottNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Maley v. BlakeneyNew York Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Davignon v. Racquette River Paper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Myron P. Gordon, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Motel City, Inc., Bankrupt v. Motel City 'B' AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Sapphire Corp. v. American Mercury Magazine, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API