Legal Opinion · Dissent
City of Ann Arbor v. Michigan
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 7, 1984No. Docket 66415Published
1DissentJ. R. Ernst, J.
I regret that I am unable to agree with the meaning which the majority ascribes to the phrase "activity or service required * * * by state law” as used in Const 1963, art 9, § 29, and file my dissent accordingly.
This Court, in O’Reilly v Wayne County, 116 Mich App 582, 589; 323 NW2d 493 (1982), held:
"In interpreting a constitution, 'the technical rules of statutory construction do not apply’. Traverse City School Dist v Attorney General, 384 Mich 390, 405; 185 NW2d 9 (1971). In Council 23 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v Wayne County Civil Service Comm, 32 Mich App…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Traverse City School Dist. v. Atty. Gen.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Dauer v. ZabelMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Dauer v. ZabelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- O'REILLY v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Council 23 American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Wayne County Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971