Legal Opinion

Caryl v. Greenwald

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

This motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is granted.

The plaintiff, a real estate broker, was allegedly employed by the owner of certain property to procure a purchaser. It was agreed that brokerage commissions would be paid by the owner “ if and when title closes.” The defendants are the purchasers. After executing a written agreement with sellers, defendants refused to complete the purchase.

Plaintiff does not allege that the defendants ever expressly or impliedly agreed to employ her or to pay her a commission for her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seaver v. . RansomNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Amies v. WesnofskeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Parker v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Sieven v. GlazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  5. Greene v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Donato v. BaltrusaitisNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API