Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Aldredge

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1939No. 12972PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reid, Chief Justice.

“A discharge under a writ of habeas corpus, after a conviction, can not be granted unless the judgment is absolutely void; as where the convicting court was without jurisdiction, or where the defendant in his trial was denied due process of law, in violation of the Federal fourteenth amendment (Code, § 1-815), and the State constitution (art. 1, see. 1, par. 5; Code § 2-105). Since the writ can not be used merely as a substitute for a writ of error or other remedial procedure to correct errors of law, of which the defendant had opportunity to avail himself, no question as…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilcoxon v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Riley v. GarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Bush v. ChappellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  4. Shoemake v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  5. Brown v. HollandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API