Legal Opinion
In re Martin D.
New York City Family Court
Decided July 24, 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
M. Holt Meyer, J.
On April 16, 1979, the Grand Jury of Kings County found reasonable cause to believe that respondents herein had committed acts which, if done by a person over the age of 16, would constitute the crimes of petit larceny (Penal Law, § 155.25), criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree (Penal Law, § 165.40), assault in the third degree (Penal Law, § 120.00), and harassment (Penal Law, § 240.25).1 Because none of the afore-mentioned would constitute indictable offenses, the Grand Jury voted to file a request to remove these charges to Kings…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lawrence Constr. Corp. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Allen v. MinskoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People Ex Rel. Lefever v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Stone v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Jose D.New York City Family Court · 1980
- In re Shawn S.New York Family Court · 1981
- Herald Co. v. MarianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- In re Miguel M.New York City Family Court · 1985
- People v. Seneca InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 2000