Kinetic Systems, Inc. v. Federal Financing Bank
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR ■ SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAMUEL CONTI, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
In September of 2009, the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) and Defendant Federal Financing Bank (“FFB”) entered into a series of agreements with Solyndra FAB 2, LLC (“FAB 2”). FAB 2 was wholly owned by Solyndra, Inc. (“Solyn-dra”), a now-defunct solar panel technology company. FFB purchased a promissory note from FAB 2 in the amount of $535 million, and DOE guaranteed the note. Plaintiff Kinetic Systems, Inc. (“Kinetics”) is a California contractor. It was hired to perform work on a Solyndra…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Theisen v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Truestone, Inc. v. Simi West Industrial Park IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.