Legal Opinion
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Fish & Game Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 16, 1994No. 94-35280PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
42 F.3d 1278
SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FISH & GAME COMMISSION, IDAHO, sued as: Idaho Fish & Game
Commission; Jerry Conley, individually and in his official
capacity as Director of Idaho Fish and Game; Richard
Meiers; Norm Guth; Louis Racine; Wesley Rose, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-35280.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1994.
Decided Dec. 16, 1994.
Candy L. Jackson and Jeanette Wolfley, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Fort Hall, ID, for plaintiff-appellant.
Clive J. Strong, Deputy Atty. Gen., and Steven W. Strack, Deputy Atty. Gen.,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Antoine v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moore v. City of HarrimanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Feeney v. NapolitanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Skokomish Indian v. Tacoma Public UtilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Skokomish Indian v. Tacoma Public UtilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- A. CLARK V. SHIRLEY WEBERCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.